Marketing companies sell dating profiles demographic online dating users
It seems that everyone is a member of a social network these days.
Whether it's your kids on My Space and Facebook, or your colleagues on Linked In, people are taking advantage of these new online meeting spaces to make friends, communicate and expand business opportunities.
The site must also not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity.
This creates an interesting problem for most sites that allow users to post music, photos or video.
For instance, several content owners, including media giant Viacom, have sued You Tube, the video sharing site, for copyright infringement, and You Tube has claimed a 512(c) defense.
Since You Tube is a subsidiary of Google, its future business plan most likely involves serving advertisements according to the kind of video that users view or search for.
The law in this area is still relatively unsettled and constantly changing, but some recent developments have created intriguing precedent, and legislation in motion promises to keep things interesting for the foreseeable future.(The Ninth Circuit subsequently ruled in 2012 that the website's prompting, sorting and publishing of information to facilitate roommate selection is not forbidden by the FHA or FEHA.) Legal Considerations for Social Networking Users Social networking users don't enjoy any of the immunities granted to social networking sites under the law, so they should be careful to always act appropriately when posting messages or files to the sites. In both cases, the school's punishments against students for creating fake My Space pages in the names of their respective principals were upheld by federal district courts. Morse - the infamous "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case, which held that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing student speech, at a school-supervised event, that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use, the decisions are unlikely to be overturned on appeal.The main areas where users can get themselves into trouble are through the posting of defamatory content or content that infringes on intellectual property rights. Also keep in mind that many states are passing laws that create obligations to verify a user's age.The court's second justification is fairly controversial, and goes against the widely established precedent granting a broad, robust privilege to interactive service providers.
In essence, the panel's ruling holds that, by channeling information to users and providing search capabilities, has added an additional layer of information, "meta-information" you could say, that it is at least partly responsible for creating or developing.That case, Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v.Roommates.com, LLC, began when two fair housing groups sued the website Roommates.com, alleging that Roommates.com's roommate networking service violated the Fair Housing Act.Since no statutory immunities exist to shield users, the standard laws pertaining to defamation and infringement apply. had challenged the school's anti-piercing policy in her post, the court held, the comment was political speech aimed at the principal's policies, and protected under the Indiana Constitution. Any fraud or circumvention of these requirements could have repercussions for social networking users in addition to the usual charges of defamation and infringement. Follow Find Law for Legal Professionals on Twitter!